The method
Clear sources. Honest checks.
A research date is useful only when you can see what was checked. Here is what the site’s claims are based on.
Start with the app’s own pages.
I use each app’s fee, referral and terms pages to explain its published program. The original project research is dated October 25, 2026. A date beside an offer is not a claim that its updated referral link has passed an account test.
During this build, the Pump.fun fee and referral terms, Axiom referral documentation and Fomo terms were accessible. Fomo’s fee page could not be fetched by the research tool; Axiom’s terms did not provide readable text. Those limits are recorded in the guides.
Keep the evidence separate.
- Published terms: what an app states in its documentation.
- Owner confirmation: the code firepants, referral information and working links were confirmed before launch.
- Account checks: confirmation of a working link does not establish every account-level fee or late-entry rule.
- Screenshots: not published until real app captures are available, with private information removed.
I do not present the previous project’s account observations or screenshots as my own.
Recheck when something changes.
The maintenance plan is to review the program pages monthly and when an app announces a relevant change. Dates change after a real check, rather than automatically when a page is rebuilt. Changes belong in the public changelog.
I do not test referrals by signing up with my own code or creating extra wallets. An account check should never rely on self-referral.